I'll admit it. As an upper-middle-class white male,
I'm not exactly the most knowledgeable person when it comes to anything Pacific
Island culture related. Sure, I've read about it in school, and seen programs
about it on TV, but that stuff never really stuck with me. I'm rather ashamed
to say it, but if you mention the phrase "Pacific Islander" to me, a
myriad of stereotypes will wade their way into my brain. It’s mainly due to an
utter lack of knowledge or context when it comes to this sort of thing.
The Sione’s films
are interesting because they paint a picture of what Samoan life is like in New
Zealand, but don’t make this the crux of the film. So many other films will
rely on the character’s ethnicities to draw their comedy from, but neither Sione’s film relies heavily on this. The
one exception, of course, is Derek.
Derek is a “white boy from Glenfield” (as Oscar
Kightley’s character puts it). Who acts like he is ‘one of the boys’. It’s
rather ironic that a white character represents the most stereotypical and
offensive view of your average Samoan in Sione’s
Wedding, although it’s one of the film’s most brilliant (and funny)
aspects. Sione’s Wedding is a film
that by all rights gives one of the most earnest portrayals of Samoan life in
New Zealand ever captured on film.
Growing up is a major theme of both movies. At the
beginning of Sione’s Wedding, Michael
(Robbie Magasiva), Albert (Oscar Kightley), Stanley (Iahito Ah Hi), and Sefa
(Shimpal Lalisi) are really just teenagers trapped in the bodies of men in
their late 20s/early 30s. Throughout the course of the movie they each slowly
learn what it means to grow up. Albert and Tania (Madelein Sami) finally get
together, and Sefa proposes to Leilani (Teuila Blakely). In Sione’s 2, They further explore this theme
with Albert moving to the North Shore. It’s a very relatable theme, especially
for someone my age. I think that this is what gives the two films the status
they hold amongst my generation. We can all see ourselves - regardless of our
ethnicities or economic backgrounds - in these four boys.
My favourite character in these films was always
Albert. I’m not sure why. I’ve always thought that it was because Albert was
always the sanest out of the bunch of them. He always just seemed to be along
for the ride, letting the others do their thing. He’s a thirty-something year
old man with a rather boring job in insurance. That shouldn’t be that appealing right? The more I think
about it, the more I think that maybe it has to do with his arc in the films
having the least to do with his Samoan background. I can relate to Albert more
on an emotional level, and not be constantly reminded that we come from
completely different cultural backgrounds. I think with the others, they have
more quirks that are more specifically Samoan that I cannot relate to.
Michael spent most of Sione’s Wedding convincing himself that he should forego sleeping
with white girls and settle down with a ‘nice Samoan girl’. The pressure to
settle down with someone from my own ethnicity is something I have never had to
deal with from any of my relatives, yet apparently, for someone of pacific
descent, this can be a very big deal.
Sefa’s behaviour throughout a lot of the first film
exemplifies the classic stereotype of the ‘rowdy Samoan boy’. It’s a very
negative stereotype. One that does little to service the reputation of the
Samoan community in New Zealand.
I really just don’t get Stanley. That whole phone sex
line thing is just so weird and foreign to me. The fact that Stanley is also
portrayed as being quite simple-minded puts me off as well, as I think, however
unintentional it may be, that is a slightly racist portrayal of a Samoan.
But hey, I’m white. What would I know?
Despite this, I do
think that the Sione’s films
actually a pretty good job of truly breaking down racial and cultural barriers,
as well as subverting stereotypes when it comes to the portrayal of Pacifica in
New Zealand. Yes, stereotypically, the Church plays a massive role in pacific
communities, and yes, there is a little bit of hyperbole when it comes to how
it is portrayed in the Sione’s films,
but there is not a single negative way any aspects of the church are portrayed
in either movie (unless you count that Destiny Church parody in Sione’s 2, but come on, it’s pretty
funny). It’s also nice that at the end of both films, we get to see big
community events (a wedding and a funeral) the way the Samoans do them. I kind
of want a Samoan-style wedding myself now. They look like fun.
I think what is truly amazing about these films (to me
at least) is that even though they are set in Grey Lynn - a 30 minute drive
from my house – I feel like I am being presented with a window into an entirely
different country. The differences between little things such as people’s body language,
the way they speak, what words are used, and how people treat each other are
immense. The fact that all this is taking place in the same city that I have
lived in for 14 out of my 19 years on this earth is mind boggling. I have
clearly been living a very sheltered life.
I think that regardless of how you may feel about the
films themselves, these films are an integral part of NZ culture, and should be
treated as such.